Skip to content

Electoral boundary proposing fewer rural ridings - Bashaw included

Proposed changes to electoral boundaries suggests a change that could affect Bashaw residents.
web1_170607-BAS-new-riding_1

A report commissioned last year to look into the province’s electoral boundaries has suggested some changes that would see some rural ridings like Bashaw being affected.

The Electoral Boundaries Commission released an interim report on May 17 recommending the seven ridings on the eastern side of Alberta be reduced to six, which will result in Bashaw being placed into a larger re-drawn constituency.

Proposed to be named Stettler-Wainwright, the newly created riding will grow in size to the south while giving up some areas on the north end of the current riding.

The proposal would see small portions of the current Leduc-Beaumont and Fort Saskatchewan-Vegreville ridings — the area of New Sarepta then north and east to encompass Tofield — will move into the new riding, while the areas south and east including Ryley, Holden and Bruce will be placed into the re-drawn riding of Vermillion-Lloydminster.

Meanwhile, the southern border is proposed to be pushed down to include communities along Secondary Highway 599, then jog just north of Castor and continue west — taking in Gadsby, Botha, Stettler, Erskine and Nevis — until it hits Highway 21. From there, the border will go north along the County of Stettler border up to Buffalo Lake where is connects with the border of the current riding.

The other reductions are in northeastern Alberta where four ridings will fall to three and in the provinces northwest with five re-drawn into four.

To keep the Alberta legislature at 87 seats, three new ridings have been proposed. Both Edmonton and Calgary would get one additional each, while Airdrie would be split into two ridings with one of those to include Cochrane in its boundaries. There are a number of other ridings that will see either slight or major reshaping of their boundaries.

“Our interim report strikes a balance between population numbers and public interest,” explained Honourable Madam Justice Myra B. Bielby, commission chair and Albert Court of Appeal judge.

“I want to thank the hundreds of Albertans who participated in the review process to this point. The feedback was valuable and informed many of our recommendations. We look forward to receiving further input into our proposed boundary changes in the coming months.”

Justice Bielby along with commission members Laurie Livingstone, W. Bruce McLeod and D. Jean Munn agreed with the recommendations outlined in the report. The reasons for creating the new ridings was to recognize the significant growth above the provincial average in those areas and amalgamate areas that have seen lower populations.

However, one commission member Gwen Day wrote a dissenting opinion stating ridings in the cities be redrawn so as not to add any more ridings to those urban areas. It was noted that doing this would result in nearly all of the ridings in both cities being above the provincial average for population size, but below the 25 per cent maximum allowed under legislation.

In addition, the commission wants the two ridings in the far northwest to continue their special status, meaning the populations can fall between 25 and 50 per cent below the provincial average.

The public are invited to submit their feedback on the recommendations in person or through a written submission. The hearings will take place from July 17 to 21 in Grande Prairie, Vermilion, Edmonton, Calgary and Brooks.

To file a written submission or to find out more about the commission, its interim report and find maps of the suggested ridings, go to www.abebc.ca.